MINUTES
DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
JUNE 5, 2007
A Special meeting of the Board of Commissioners of the
Department of Water & Power, City of Big Bear Lake,
was called to order at 9 a.m., by Chairwoman Willey, at
the DWP Board Room,
41972 Garstin Drive, Big Bear Lake, California.
FLAG SALUTE:
Board Member Miller
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Barbara Willey, Chairwoman
Susan Conley, Vice Chairwoman
Bill Speyers, Treasurer
Fred Miller, Board Member
Bill Giamarino, Board Member
BOARD MEMBERS EXCUSED:
None
OTHERS PRESENT:
Jerry Gruber, General Manager
Diane Muir, Administrative Manager
Jennifer McCullar, Interim Principal Analyst
Steve Wilson, Water Superintendent
Dan Ballin, City Attorney, Best Best & Krieger
Robyn Bratton, Board Secretary
Rick Herrick, Mayor Pro Tem
Darrell Mulvihill, City Council Member
Liz Harris, City Council Member
Michael Karp, City Council Member
Brian Charles, Grizzly Newspaper
Danielle Seckler, Bear Valley News
Paul Mitton, Channel 6
Approximately 50 Members of the Public
ITEM NO. 3 - Approve Agenda
Motion made by Board Member
Speyers, seconded by Vice Chairwoman Conley, and carried
5-0 to approve the Agenda. |
Chairwoman Willey made a statement that
this was a public hearing and the Board
would take statements from the public regarding
the proposed water rate increases. She
stated that according to Proposition 18,
it is illegal to exempt one property owner
from paying their fair share of a water
utility bill.
GM Gruber gave a brief statement as to
why commercial rates need to be increased.
ITEM NO. 4 - Public
Forum
Chairwoman Willey opened the Public Forum
at 9:10 a.m.
Phil Dolan – 42162 Big Bear Boulevard,
Big Bear Lake – Commercial Property
Owner – Opposed
Mr. Dolan stated to the Board that he
owns a Laundromat and is opposed to the
tiered system. He would have to pass these
increases on to his customers, some of
which are low income customers.
Teri Gutierrez – 797l San Bernardino,
Sugarloaf – Residential Property
Owner - Support
Ms. Gutierrez stated that she pays for
what she uses and so should everyone else.
Vi Colunga, CEO,
Bear Valley Hospital – Opposed
Ms. Colunga stated that she is opposed
to the sudden proposed increase and feels
it should be done incrementally, over a
period of time.
Walter Con, CFO,
Bear Valley Unified School District – Opposed
Mr. Con stated that he is vehemently opposed.
This increase would equate to a 112 percent
increase ($32,000) to the District annually.
He feels this proposal should be rejected
and a joint team be formed between the
community members and joint powers.
Stan Miller, Knickerbocker
Mansion – Opposed
Mr. Miller stated that a lack of planning
on the DWP’s part should not constitute
an emergency for residents of the Valley.
Rates need to be equal across the board.
He is opposed to the tiers. He stated that
there should be an across-the-board increase
over a five to ten year period for commercial
and residential customers.
Vince Smith, Riffenburgh
Lumber – Opposed
Mr. Smith wanted to reiterate what others
have said. Rates are beyond reasonable.
He also stated that at this time, the DWP
has no one on the meter waiting list due
to the slow down of construction in the
Valley.
Kent Kessler,
Windy Point B&B – Opposed
Mr. Kessler stated that he has gone to
great lengths to conserve and lower his
water usage. He is in a R-1 Zone. He felt
that 112 percent is not fair for him to
pay, and that private rentals should also
be paying their fair share as 72 percent
of rentals in Big Bear are private and
also zoned R-1. He believes the increase
should be in increments.
Brent Tregaskis,
Chamber of Commerce -
Opposed
Mr. Tregaskis stated that he is representing
the Chamber and does not believe the situation
was handled well. He is shocked at the
increase, and the Chamber Board does not
support this proposal. It’s too much
too fast. He sympathesizes with the DWP’s
debt and infrastructure problems but believes
the DWP should work with the businesses
and come up with a better thought-out plan.
Robert Pool, Sleepy
Forest Cottages, President of the Lodging
Association – Opposed
Mr. Pool stated that his rates will go
up 133 percent and he can’t pass
this on to his customers. He has actually
dropped his rates. He said that as many
as 100 businesses could go under if this
increase goes through. He has nothing to
pass on to his customers when he is already
below income.
Charlie Brewster,
Owner of Robinhood Resorts – Opposed
Mr. Brewester stated that this increase
would cripple the whole industry and impact
the economic worth of the Valley. He stated
that there are many empty buildings in
the Village because it is too expensive
to set up a business. Commercial rates
should actually be cheaper than residential.
The DWP needs to set up a committee to
discuss in more detail.
Zintars Purvins – 243
Riverside – Residential
Property Owner – Opposed
Mr. Purvins stated that he has owned property
in Big Bear for 33 years and only uses
his cabin three to six times a year. He
feels he is being charged for unused water.
Full-time and part-time property owners
should be charged separately.
Dana DuVall – 137
Wabash, Sugarloaf – Residential
Property Owner – Support
Ms. DuVall stated that she is a full-time
resident and the old water system needs
to be upgraded. She talked about how many
sink holes in other cities are due to faulty
water pipelines. There is also the fire
issue and this is a threatened area. We
need to make sure our water is being delivered
properly and residents cannot bear the
brunt of the increases alone.
Denise Proffer – 881
Victoria, Sugarloaf – Residential
Property Owner – Support
Ms. Proffer stated that her biggest fear
is fire and not if it happens, but when
it happens, the water system has to be
maintained – fire is an equal opportunity
destroyer.
Helen Purvins – 243
Riverside – Residential
Property Owner – Opposed
Mrs. Purvins stated that she has been
a part-time homeowner for over 30 years.
Her and her husband are retired and have
a small, one bedroom cabin. Her tax bill
is now higher than her residence in Yucapia.
Her electricity has tripled in less than
two years. She stated that there have been
too many increases on her water and tax
bill. There are no representatives for
part-time residents.
Carolyn Knudsen – 1181 Sugarpine
Rd. – Residential Property Owner – Support
Ms. Knudsen stated that the fire danger
in Big Bear is higher this year than last
year, and residents can’t continue
to subsidize commercial property owners.
William Hazewinkel,
The Inn @ Fawnskin – Opposed
Mr. Hazewinkel stated the he had requested
information on some DWP customer accounts
so he could send to the PUC. He said he
waited three plus weeks for a written response
from his letter to Jerry Gruber. He received
a fax stating the DWP could not respond
for 20-40 days.
Reese Troublefield,
Big Bear Valley Rec & Parks
District – Support
Mr. Troublefield stated that his dealings
with Jerry Gruber and Bill La Have have
always been fair. He understood that over
the last 15, years the DWP’s water
rates were benevolent. He supports Walter
Con’s comment about the Park and
School Districts sitting down to look at
the issue again and why the
112 percent impact is all at once.
Chairwoman Willey closed the Public Hearing
at 9:50 a.m.
ITEM NO. 5.1 - Consider
Proposed Water Rate Increase
Chairwoman Willey made the following statements
regarding public comments:
- Private home rentals are a City
and County issue, not a DWP issue.
- There are no water charges on
tax bills. Customers are not charged
for water not used.
- Personal customer account information
is not given out to the public.
- In the past, Bear Valley Electric
did raise their rates and they
tripled. It is a misconception as to
how much commercial water rates are going
to increase. Anyone wishing to know the
amount of the increase on their bill
is welcome to call the DWP office, and
one of the staff members will calculate
it.
- The DWP is also a non-profit
organization.
ITEM NO. 5.2 - Consider Adoption
of Resolution No. DWP 2007-11 Establishing
Water Rates,
Charges, and Fees, and recommending to the City Council of Big Bear Lake that
the City Council Rescind Ordinance No. 2003-330 and a Portion of Ordinance
No. 2002-321 and a Portion of Ordinance No. 2004-340 and that the City
Council Adopt Increased Commercial Usage Charges and System Rehabilitation
Fees
Discussion from Board members and staff:
Board Member Miller stated that he has been on the Board for two years
and the main reason he applied to the Board was because of his concerns
for water. He also has a background in water He questioned why the residents
have to carry the load for commercial owners. Water companies off the
hill are experiencing the same issues that are facing the DWP.
Vice Chairman Conley stated that she owned a business in the Village
for 15 years and has been a resident for 18 years. She can relate to
the concerns as a business owner; however, the DWP has a responsibility
to provide water safely to the public. During her 6-1/2 years on the
Board, she has found that there has been an inequity between the residential
and commercial water rates. The bottom line is this is the cost of doing
business.
Board Member Speyers stated it might be good to have another presentation.
Chairman Willey stated that staff has conducted numerous presentations
throughout the DWP community. It is a matter of the cost of doing business.
The DWP is not making use of a commodity to hold the public as hostage,
and the DWP has been working on and preparing for this for over a year.
General Manager Gruber stated that on June 11, the City Council will
vote on this issue and there will be an expanded PowerPoint presentation
to specifically identify certain businesses that will be impacted. He
encouraged the public to attend.
Chairman Willey strongly urged the public to attend our Board meetings.
Board Member Giamarino stated that he was the newest Board Member.
He feels the DWP needs to create an infrastructure that delivers water
and solve problems for the Valley. We need to rectify what has been
done in the past. He also encouraged the public to attend the Board
meetings.
Administrative Manager Muir stated that there was a misunderstanding
regarding the 112 percent increase. Depending on how the customer used
water within their current base rate will determine the percentage change.
The largest increase will be 112 percent; however, most will vary and
some will go down.
Board Member Willey received five verbal ayes and the resolution was
adopted.
ITEM NO. 6 - Adjournment
No further business came before the Board. Chairman Willey
adjourned the meeting at 10:03 a.m.